According to the SCI guidelines, will Nobel laureate Hinton be dismissed?

In the past twenty years, China has been placing increasing emphasis on the academic journals for publishing papers, while paying less attention to the content.

The evaluation section that is led by non-professionals is difficult to understand, but they love to take charge, so they only look at the magazine names.

The evaluation led by those who are actually ignorant and narrow-minded and have a limited knowledge base (which is also the majority of academic evaluations in China) is actually incomprehensible. In addition, there is not enough time (often called upon for various evaluations), so only the names of the journals are looked at.

Rating led by individuals who pursue "fairness" and "objectivity" on the surface requires quantitative methods, so in the end, it's also the name of the magazine (and its so-called SCI score).

A certain institution has created different zones to cater to individuals with various levels of intelligence and laziness: Zone 1 being the best, and Zone 4 the worst.

This year, the Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded to scientists in artificial intelligence, with research by Geoffrey Hinton published in the journal Neural Computation. This journal is categorized as Q4 and has a low impact factor in the SCI.

If a reviewer only focuses on reading magazines and frequently issues warnings, they may be considered as someone the unit should not continue to use.

Please don't laugh, many organizations use this kind of partition.